Infor’s Preferred Services Partner

You are logged in.

Find Your Best-Fit ERP Software

Answer a few quick questions and get personalized ERP recommendations for your industry.

Learning Center

Articles

The Six Big Losses in OEE: 2026 Manufacturing Data, Costs, and Benchmarks

What are the Six Big Losses in OEE?

The Six Big Losses are the most common causes of lost manufacturing productivity: equipment failure, setup and adjustments, idling and minor stops, reduced speed, process defects, and reduced yield. They affect the three components of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE): availability, performance, and quality. Identifying which losses consume the most production time helps manufacturers prioritize improvements that can increase throughput, reduce downtime, and improve OEE.

The Six Big Losses in manufacturing are:

  • Equipment failure: Unplanned machine downtime that reduces availability
  • Setup and adjustments: Production time lost during changeovers, setup, and machine adjustments
  • Idling and minor stops: Brief interruptions that reduce performance without creating extended downtime
  • Reduced speed: Production running below the equipment’s ideal cycle time
  • Process defects: Defective products produced during normal operation
  • Reduced yield: Scrap and defects generated during startup before stable production is reached

Equipment failure and setup losses reduce availability. Minor stops and reduced speed reduce performance. Process defects and reduced yield reduce quality.

Unplanned downtime, the first of the Six Big Losses, drains 11% of annual revenue from the world’s 500 largest companies, a $1.4 trillion bill Siemens measured across four industrial sectors. All six losses together hold the average plant near a 60% OEE score against a world-class benchmark of 85%. NIST priced the preventable share of that gap at $119.1 billion in US discrete manufacturing alone.

We analyzed the six losses one at a time, drawing on surveys and case studies, which let us rank each loss by its measured share. Each section below quantifies one loss group using the strongest available published measure, such as cost, production time lost, share of total losses, or impact on OEE.

Key Takeaways

  • Reduced speed tops the loss ranking on more production lines than any other category, peaking at 58.1% of all losses on a six-machine plastics operation.
  • Changeover accounts for 37% of OEE decline, more than any other single cause.
  • Reactive-heavy plants lose 13.0% of planned production time to downtime. Predictive-heavy plants lose 4.0%.
  • Unplanned downtime consumes 11% of revenue at the world’s 500 largest companies, a figure Siemens put at $1.4 trillion.

How Godlan Analyzed the Six Big Losses

Godlan reviewed published manufacturing studies, industry research, and production case studies measuring the Six Big Losses across discrete and process manufacturing environments. Because studies report manufacturing losses differently, we compared each loss using the strongest published measure available, such as the percentage of total losses, production time lost, OEE impact, defect rates, or financial cost. Results should be interpreted as industry benchmarks rather than expected results for an individual facility.

What Each of the Six Big Losses Costs

Every production loss is sorted into six categories that roll up into the three OEE factors. Each one demands a different fix. Our analysis below maps each loss to its OEE factor, along with the hardest verified number behind it.

Big LossOEE FactorWhat Measured Data Shows
Equipment failureAvailabilityHeaviest reactive-maintenance quartile loses 13.0% of planned production time to downtime (NIST, 2020)
Setup and adjustmentsAvailabilityChangeover drives 37% of OEE decline, the single largest cause (JMMP, 2020)
Idling and minor stopsPerformanceReached 62.73% of measured losses on a sheet-metal blanking line (IJIEM)
Reduced speedPerformanceConsumed 58.1% of all losses on a six-machine plastics line (MSPE, 2024)
Process defectsQualityQuality rejections took 22.84% of total losses on a biscuit line (PES, 2020)
Reduced yieldQualityStartup rejects before steady state, against a 1% world-class quality allowance (Vorne)

Key Insights:

  • Performance losses outranked availability losses on four of the five lines measured below, which upends the assumption that breakdowns dominate OEE.
  • Operators clear minor stops in under two minutes. Plants without cycle-level monitoring never record them.

Score Your Own Six Losses Before You Spend a Dollar Fixing Them

Feed Godlan's OEE Calculator one shift of production data. It ranks your six losses and names the one eating the most hours before you commit capital. Discrete manufacturers size the prize in ten minutes.

Availability Losses: What Breakdowns and Changeovers Cost

Availability losses cost the most per event because they stop the line outright. Siemens priced those stopped hours. NIST measured the planned production time they consume. The table below prices both availability losses.

Availability MetricFigureSource
Unplanned downtime as share of revenue, world’s 500 largest companies11% ($1.4 trillion)Siemens, 2024
Cost of one lost production hour, automotive$2.3 millionSiemens, 2024
Cost of one lost production hour, fast-moving consumer goods$36,000Siemens, 2024
Downtime incidents per facility per month25 in 2023, down from 42 in 2019Siemens, 2024
Planned production time lost to downtime, heaviest reactive quartile13.0%NIST, 2020
Planned production time lost to downtime, lightest reactive quartile4.0%NIST, 2020
Changeover share of OEE decline37%JMMP, 2020

Key Insights:

  • Manufacturers cut downtime frequency 40% between 2019 and 2023. Cost per hour climbed anyway, so every remaining stop bills higher than the last.
  • Changeover drives 37% of OEE decline, the largest share any study assigns to one cause, which rewards SMED discipline.

Performance Losses: What Slow Cycles and Minor Stops Cost

Performance losses hide because the line keeps running. Machines drift below rated speed while the shift report still shows full uptime. Our data indicates this quiet loss outweighs every other category on most lines.

Production LineOEEPerformance RateReduced Speed LossIdling and Minor Stops
Plastics, six machines (MSPE, 2024)No dataNo data58.1% of all lossesStudy groups these in 12.73% disruptions
Beverage bottling (OPSI, 2025)69.35%70.9%28.48% of loading time0.24% of loading time
Biscuit capper (PES, 2020)69.47%91.24%26.23% of losses10.56% of losses
Plastic injection moulding, worst month (JMMP, 2026)53.9%71.4%Cycles ran 53-60s against a 45s targetNo data
Sheet-metal blanking (IJIEM)71%84%No data62.73% of losses

Key Insights:

  • Reduced speed topped the ranking on three lines across three industries, making it the most consistent OEE thief in the published record.
  • The injection moulding line ran cycles of 53-60 seconds against a 45-second target while quality held above 99%, proof that a clean quality report hides a bleeding performance rate.

Convert Recovered Hours Into a Payback Number Your CFO Will Sign

Four recovered performance-rate points of one work center change throughput math for the whole plant. Godlan's ERP ROI framework prices recovered runtime against implementation cost for discrete manufacturers. Godlan has run this calculation for 40 years with zero failed implementations.

Quality Losses: What Defects and Startup Scrap Cost

Quality losses destroy machine time twice over. Vorne sets world-class quality at 99%. In our analysis below, quality separates process control from equipment condition.

Production LineQuality RateDefect or Scrap Measure
World-class benchmark (Vorne)99%1% of net run time
Beverage bottling (OPSI, 2025)99.9%0.0895% of loading time
Plastic injection moulding (JMMP, 2026)Above 99%Peak monthly scrap 0.94%
Biscuit capper (PES, 2020)85.77%Rejections took 22.84% of total losses
Heaviest reactive-maintenance quartile (NIST, 2020)No data16.0 times more defects than lightest quartile

Key Insights:

  • A 14-point quality gap separates the best line we reviewed from the worst. That gap moves OEE 14 points on its own.
  • NIST tied defect rates to maintenance strategy, so quality losses trace back to the machines generating availability losses.

What Manufacturers Recover When They Attack the Six Losses

IJPHM measured the penalty plants pay for running machines to failure. The table below shows what a maintenance strategy shift returns.

Change in ApproachMeasured ResultSource
Predictive and preventive over reactive maintenance52.7% less unplanned downtimeIJPHM, 2021
Predictive and preventive over reactive maintenance78.5% fewer defectsIJPHM, 2021
Predictive over preventive maintenance18.5% less unplanned downtimeIJPHM, 2021
Predictive over preventive maintenance87.3% fewer defectsIJPHM, 2021
Structured OEE program, injection moulding lineOEE climbed from 53.9% to 95.8%JMMP, 2026

Key Insights:

  • Predictive and preventive programs together cut unplanned downtime 52.7% against run-to-failure, the largest single lever in the verified data.
  • One injection moulding line gained 42 OEE points through structured measurement, finishing past the 85% world-class mark.

Which of the Six Big Losses Should Manufacturers Address First?

There is no single Six Big Loss that costs every manufacturer the most. The largest loss depends on the equipment, production process, maintenance strategy, product mix, and operating environment.

Across the studies analyzed by Godlan, however, performance losses frequently exceeded availability losses. Reduced speed ranked as the largest measured loss across several production lines, while minor stops accounted for as much as 62.73% of measured losses on one sheet-metal blanking line.

The practical answer is to measure all six losses before choosing where to invest. A plant experiencing frequent breakdowns may benefit most from predictive maintenance, while another facility may recover more capacity by reducing changeover time, minor stops, or slow cycles.

How Manufacturers Can Track the Six Big Losses in Real Time

Identifying the Six Big Losses requires more than calculating OEE at the end of a shift. Manufacturers need visibility into the machine events, cycle times, downtime reasons, production counts, and quality data behind the OEE score.

Godlan helps discrete manufacturers connect shop-floor production data with Infor CloudSuite Industrial (SyteLine) using Prophecy IoT®. Cycle-level machine data can feed live OEE dashboards that help manufacturing teams identify:

  • Unplanned equipment downtime
  • Setup and changeover losses
  • Recurring minor stops
  • Actual versus ideal cycle time
  • Production running below target speed
  • Scrap and quality losses
  • OEE trends by machine, line, shift, or work center

This gives operations teams visibility into why OEE is falling, rather than simply reporting the final OEE percentage.

Godlan brings more than 40 years of manufacturing ERP experience and the world’s largest Infor CloudSuite Industrial services team to manufacturing technology deployments.

Start with the ERP Selection Criteria Checklist to determine what shop-floor visibility and manufacturing data integration your operation requires.

Further Reading

Take This Report to Your Next Operations Review

Every figure on this page traces to a named source below. Manufacturing leaders hand this report to finance to settle which loss deserves the next investment. Request a PDF copy of this report. We send the full source data with it.

Sources

Discover what is possible for your enterprise.

Reach out to our team today to begin a conversation to discuss your specific needs, infrastructure, and growth opportunities.

Godlan is a name you can trust.

Scroll to Top

Login

Access everything in the learning center. 

Not a member? Don’t worry, it’s free…

Having trouble logging in?
Try logging in here.

Find your best fit ERP

Download your customized recommendations here

Step 1 of 4

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
How many people are in your organization?(Required)